Make repeat emit Utf8View for Utf8View input#20612
Open
kumarUjjawal wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Open
Make repeat emit Utf8View for Utf8View input#20612kumarUjjawal wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
kumarUjjawal wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Apparently I did a PR for the same change without realizing it #20645 Reviewers can select which of these PR's should be merged in. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #20585
Rationale for this change
String UDFs should preserve string representation where feasible. repeat previously accepted Utf8View input but emitted Utf8, causing an unnecessary type downgrade. This aligns repeat with the expected behavior of returning the same string type as its primary input.
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?
No